Hoover Dam, never again
Uploaded by: PropagandaBuster
Video Description:
In the 1930's in the middle of a desert between Las Vegas, Nevada, and Phoenix, Arizona, on the Colorado River, a huge dam was built by the Federal government. This was an enormous project as a city had to be built to house the workers and the Colorado River had to be re-routed to build the dam. All this took four long grueling years. Then some fifty years later the same government decided to build a visitors center at the dam. This took nine years, more that twice the time it took to build a city, re-route a river, and build a huge dam. Thus illustrating once more that liberalism is a mental disorder. Due to liberalism environmental impact studies were required, mountains of government regulations and dozens of agencies to seek approval from. Plus the unions who donate generously to the Democratic Party. All of these evils were not present in the 1930, thus allowing the dam to be constructed without interference by humans. The government of these here United States was established in part to promote interstate commerce. Modern day liberalism has seen this as meaning to play interference in business, making it monumental to conduct business in this nation, once a democratic republic.
Tags for this video: analysis center commentary Dam documentary environmentalist Hoover liberal liberalism news visitor
Find more videos in the "News" category
See more videos uploaded by PropagandaBuster
| Building of Hoover Dam part 1 | Building of Hoover Dam part 5 | Music Video I Made at Hoover Dam |
 |  |  |
| Hover Dam Visit | Building of Hoover Dam part 4 | Korean eating dogs an apology based on lies |
 |  |  |
Share This Video:
Comments for this Grand Canyon video: Show || Hide
Tell a friend:
He can't refute the question, so he attacks the questioner.
Typical of the GOP. Any wonder only 25% of all American describe themself as a Republican...a new low?
PropagadaBuster busts propaganda as much as Goebbels did.
A piece of slime who defended Nanking and Bataan as being a "lovely" piece of work.
Unadulterated slime
Obama must be your savior. Too bad he isn't the deep rooted African-American you had hoped him to be. :(
No wonder 75% of all Americans associate the GOP with lies and deceit.
recite the lyrics of another tv show...continue to exhibit your intelligence.
I would rather be the love child for a group of lifers at San Quinten than be a Republican.
I do not have enough hate or disregard for civil liberties to ever be a member of the GOP.
"I'd rather be the love child for a group of lifers at San Quinten than be a Republican"
Those brothas are more readily to accept you. Make sure you walk around w/ your pants sagging down. You don't want to break away from family traditions.
And you claim that PB and I are racist when you use derogatory terms against Japanese people? You should put a stop to your own bigotry before lecturing anybody else to stop their own.
BTW, PB and I have never said anything racist about black people despite the fact that you want to paint both of us as racist.
No cannot point out a single time I have called you or this piece of slime a racist.
I have said, and will continue to say, that he is a piece of shit for defending Nanking and Bataan as "lovely pieces of work"
It's also not my way of thinking that are any of the world's problems. They're in fact the solutions, which you don't want to see implemented since it would mean nobody would have to live in the stone ages.
You never made any points to begin with and you never refuted my points.
And PB has also never defended Nanking or Bataan.
And you're telling me that hate crime legislation isn't thought policing.
PropagandaBuster posted a video complaining about the march on Washington by anti-war protesters, and called them traitors.
Two days later he took it down.
You display the classic GOP traits of lies and deceit.
Any wonder only 25% of all Americans identify themself as a Republican...a new low?
You never make any sense with any of your posts, so I've never tried to refute you. Living in the stone ages? What are you talking about?
Hate crime isn't punishing thought, it's punishing a crime and accounting for motive you simpleton.
All hate crime means is that you fully account for motive - it doesn't mean you can punish someone for hating someone, It just defines motive for the crime.
Idiot.
You use only personal attacks against people who don't think like you yet you whine and complain when you get personally attacked.
Spin around that it's punishing the motive but no other crimes are charged based on motive. It's based on the action in case you've never studied law.
If you run over a person with a car the "action" is running over a person with a car. INTENT is what matters under the law - that's why it isn't important THAT you ran someone over - what's important is WHY you ran that person over.
Accidental, premeditated or in the heat of the moment. These have to be proven.
Therefor, if the investigator can prove "hate" as the motive for crime why shouldn't it be prosecuted thusly?
You have either been educated incorrectly on this point or you are simply an incompetent fool. Both is likely.